|
Post by Partridge on Apr 18, 2023 14:38:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by fabtastique on Apr 19, 2023 11:55:13 GMT -5
Thanks Tony, much appreciated !
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on Apr 19, 2023 13:03:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on Apr 21, 2023 0:34:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sliderocker on Apr 21, 2023 16:45:11 GMT -5
Reading through these. The HP 1971 interview was interesting given the article was about two years old by that point. Still, there was more to learn about Linda and that she always seemed to have strong opinions about everything. I gave the other articles a quick scan and will read them when I come back from doing what I need to do, which is get myself some meds for aches and pains.
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on Apr 22, 2023 23:54:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dianna on Apr 23, 2023 2:17:55 GMT -5
"The Queen Of Lonely?" And throughout the entire article with the digs. .. They might as well just labeled her clinical. Sheesh! That may have been the article Linda referred to when she was interviewed by the guy from Australia in the 80's via satellite. I believe this is the same article with the antique brooch on her lace blouse where she was sick and the editor or whomever told her to bring whatever she had in her closet and they would play.. All that fuss and only 1 photo... I wish they would have used more photos of dear lonely Linda..
|
|
|
Post by MokyWI on Apr 23, 2023 6:53:03 GMT -5
"The Queen Of Lonely?" And throughout the entire article with the digs. .. They might as well just labeled her clinical. Sheesh! That may have been the article Linda referred to when she was interviewed by the guy from Australia in the 80's via satellite. I believe this is the same article with the antique brooch on her lace blouse where she was sick and the editor or whomever told her to bring whatever she had in her closet and they would play.. All that fuss and only 1 photo... I wish they would have used more photos of dear lonely Linda.. Again, trying to paint her as a daisy may of heartbreak. It was getting a bit old by 79’.
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on Apr 23, 2023 20:02:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MokyWI on Apr 24, 2023 13:49:14 GMT -5
I read that article when it came out. Great addition to the website.
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on Apr 30, 2023 23:36:07 GMT -5
I found a couple more items. First, a review of TRIO in Playboy Magazine, July 1987. Reviewed by Christgau and rated by the other critics. Then I found this snippet in COUNTRY MUSIC Magazine, about the original abortion of the TRIO II album.
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 2, 2023 12:39:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 2, 2023 23:37:55 GMT -5
LA Times, October 5, 1981
|
|
|
Post by eddiejinnj on May 3, 2023 9:39:10 GMT -5
Hey Boss, Love the pic of the Kinkster. Is that you with him? Thanks for all the reading material. eddiejinnj
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 3, 2023 23:38:41 GMT -5
Hey Boss, Love the pic of the Kinkster. Is that you with him? Thanks for all the reading material. eddiejinnj Yeah, I was looking shiny that day. Found it while rummaging through my magazines.
Here is a new scan of People Magazine, October 24, 1977 (click here)
|
|
|
Post by RobGNYC on May 4, 2023 7:46:32 GMT -5
People Magazine’s style of writing…I’m sure Karla was thrilled at being described as “the promising soundalike.” In 1977, People was still a fairly respected magazine.
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 4, 2023 15:53:48 GMT -5
I found this previously unposted article about Linda Ronstadt / Aaron Neville from People Magazine, August 17, 1990
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 5, 2023 14:15:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eddiejinnj on May 5, 2023 17:38:49 GMT -5
You look great in pic. I am guessing but is shiny happy or you mean your face was shiny. I'll look up colloquial meanings for shiny. I would love to meet the "Kinkster". You got me hooked on his books. I had a couple in Florida I forgot to get to this winter. eddiejinnj
PS: Very clean or polished. That you are!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 5, 2023 19:59:47 GMT -5
Jazz Times review, December 2004
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 5, 2023 20:28:54 GMT -5
review of Trio from Stereo Review, July 1987
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 5, 2023 20:40:42 GMT -5
review of Lush Life from Stereo Review, February 1985
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 5, 2023 21:19:20 GMT -5
from Down Beat Magazine, June 1984
|
|
Tony (forgot to log in first)
Guest
|
Post by Tony (forgot to log in first) on May 7, 2023 14:24:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 7, 2023 21:01:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Partridge on May 12, 2023 22:48:06 GMT -5
Here is a new scan of one of Linda's most contentious interviews. She did not seem to be in a good mood, and the interviewer asked questions that clearly annoyed her. I thought the Gram Parsons remark was stupid. This is from Rolling Stone Magazine, July 13, 1995 issue.
|
|
|
Post by fabtastique on May 13, 2023 3:31:09 GMT -5
That interviewer sounds like a dick …. And he obviously had an agenda when speaking to Linda.
|
|
|
Post by RobGNYC on May 13, 2023 8:14:43 GMT -5
Reads almost like a parody of an interview. Bowling? Linda clearly had no patience for Rolling Stone by this point. Her interview in “The Rolling Stone Book of Women in Rock” (1997) was even more contentious. Both interviewers seemed to have one goal—to provoke her. Not good journalism, especially when the interviewer interrupted her thoughts on her music (“Emmy and I had been working on a track…”), which I’m sure Linda thought was the whole point of the interviews.
|
|
|
Post by erik on May 13, 2023 12:30:26 GMT -5
I think the vast majority of us could have probably gotten a better Q&A out of Linda than Rolling Stone's mid-1990's fruitcake interviewer got--provided we weren't nervous about being in her presence, of course.
|
|
|
Post by RobGNYC on May 13, 2023 12:44:40 GMT -5
How far Rolling Stone’s standards fell compared with Linda’s cover-story interviews by Ben Fong-Torres, Cameron Crowe, and Peter Herbst.
|
|