|
|
Post by germancanadian on Feb 10, 2019 15:20:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by the Scribe on Feb 10, 2019 15:56:34 GMT -5
They need to do that for albums. Watch her numbers rise. Linda was a bigger album seller than a singles seller. |
|
|
|
Post by eddiejinnj on Feb 10, 2019 18:38:24 GMT -5
Yeah. it seems wrong to me. I can list quite a few that I would ? Linda is definitely an album artist. eddiejinfl
|
|
|
|
Post by erik on Feb 10, 2019 22:49:53 GMT -5
Quote by ronstadtfanaz:
Quote by eddieinnj:
The ranking of #82 is based on the number of songs she got onto the Hot 100, combined with their peak position (ten Top Tens; seven in the Top 5; three to #2; and "You're No Good at #1). But if they did do rankings based on the chart placement of her albums, then she would have to be at least in the upper half (IMHO).
|
|
|
|
Post by musedeva on Feb 11, 2019 4:24:06 GMT -5
STREISAND is at 44 and linda is near double that?  Aaagghhhh.something ain't right MADONNA IS NUMBER two? INcredulous!!! the ONE thing that give s me hope in humanity is the BEATLES AT NUMBER ONE.....thank god....cuz when that goes....I go!!!hahahah |
|
|
|
Post by eddiejinnj on Feb 11, 2019 17:11:59 GMT -5
Streisand is number one in females for album sales and she at 44. So that is another reason we can extrapolate that Linda would be higher on an album oriented list. eddiejinfl
|
|
Aaagghhhh.something ain't right